One structure from request to release
Requests, requirements, plans, tests, releases and leadership decisions sit in one connected hierarchy, so status is read from the work instead of assembled into reports.
The platformSyncupHUB vs Asana
Asana coordinates requests and ownership across departments. SyncupHUB is built for software delivery: from a business request through requirements, planning, tests and release evidence to the leadership decision, with role-specific AI agents that propose and people who approve.
Book a walkthroughThis page is published by SyncupHUB. Facts about Asana come from Asana’s own pricing, product and support pages, linked below and checked on 27 September 2026; fit and trade-off notes are our assessments, not independent test results.
What changes with SyncupHUB
Six things a team coming from Asana gets in SyncupHUB. Each links to the page that explains how it works and what it needs.
Requests, requirements, plans, tests, releases and leadership decisions sit in one connected hierarchy, so status is read from the work instead of assembled into reports.
The platformSeventeen persona agents, backed by 59 sub-agents, do role-shaped jobs: the PO Agent drafts acceptance criteria, the Scrum Master Agent prepares ceremonies. Each proposes; a person approves.
AI agentsThe Delivery Digital Twin reads capacity, dependencies and carryover together, forecasts the release where the evidence supports it, and tests a scope change before anyone commits to it.
Delivery Digital TwinFollow a requirement to the code that shipped it, and draft test cases from its acceptance criteria for QA to approve, so release readiness rests on evidence.
QA IntelligenceRun models inside your own tenant, or use the OpenAI and Claude APIs and other providers your administrator approves. In-tenant usage is unmetered, with no per-seat AI fee.
AI and Tools MarketplaceThe Leadership Cockpit shows portfolio health, programmes at risk and the decisions waiting on you, read from the same delivery evidence the teams work in.
Leadership CockpitThe capability comparison
Select a cell to see its scope, plan conditions and official source. Related capabilities are narrower or different in scope, not equivalents.
Showing 15 of 15 capabilities
Select a cell for feature details, plan conditions and its source.
| CapabilityCompare by workflow | SyncupHUBOUR PLATFORM | AsanaPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Digital twins | ||
| Delivery Digital TwinEvidence, forecasts & delivery scenarios | ||
| Resource TwinSkills, availability & staffing scenarios | ||
| Role AI, quality & discovery | ||
| Persona AI for Scrum rolesProduct Owner, Scrum Master, engineering & QA | ||
| QA IntelligenceTest generation, coverage & review | ||
| Product Discovery HubCustomer evidence, opportunities & validation | ||
| AI & tool ecosystem | ||
| AI MarketplaceAgent, model & tool catalogues | ||
| Sync with JiraOngoing updates, direction & connector scope | ||
| Delivery & planning | ||
| Agile deliveryBoards, backlogs and sprints | ||
| Timelines & dependenciesScheduling and linked work | ||
| Portfolio oversightVisibility across projects | ||
| Collaboration & knowledge | ||
| Docs & knowledgeDocuments beside the work | ||
| Visual whiteboardsFreeform boards and diagrams | ||
| Reviews & approvalsReview steps and sign-off | ||
| Intelligence & capacity | ||
| AI assistance & agentsCapabilities and usage terms | ||
| Capacity & scenariosWorkload, forecasts or what-if tools | ||
Scroll sideways to compare all platforms. Related capabilities offer a narrower or different scope, not an equivalent feature. Open a cell for plan limits and integration details.
Pricing and fit
Public list prices in USD, checked 27 September 2026. Entry plans are not equivalent feature bundles; price the tier your workflow needs.
Delivery, Visual Canvas & Document Spaces
Our platform is worth evaluating when your main problem is the handoff between requests, plans, delivery evidence and leadership decisions. Pilot one complete delivery path with your own data.
Validate connector coverage, deployment requirements and data readiness. Private in-tenant AI is an Enterprise option; forecast quality depends on the available evidence.
Cloud starts with a free one-month trial, then lists $7.65 per user/month; confirm contract and billing terms. Self-hosting has no recurring licence fee, but setup and infrastructure costs apply. Enterprise + Private AI is quoted separately.
Cross-functional coordination
A strong shortlist for business teams coordinating requests and ownership across departments. Evaluate it using a real intake-to-approval workflow, including the reporting your leaders need.
Portfolio oversight and approvals sit above Starter. Compare the required tier with your current Jira setup, rather than treating the entry price as the complete cost.
$13.49 per user with monthly billing. Paid subscriptions start at 2 seats; seat-bucket rules apply as the team grows.
Bring one real workflow to a 30-minute walkthrough on your own delivery, and we will show how it runs in SyncupHUB and what moving it involves. If some of your teams already work in Jira, SyncupHUB connects to it in both directions; plan a move from Asana rather than a live sync.
Book a 30-minute walkthroughCommon questions
For software delivery, yes. Asana is strong at coordinating requests and ownership across departments; SyncupHUB runs software delivery from request and requirements through tests and release evidence to the leadership decision, with an agent for every delivery role. For cross-department coordination, Asana may remain the better fit.
Yes, one team at a time. Bring one real workflow to a 30-minute walkthrough and we will show how it runs in SyncupHUB and what moving it involves. SyncupHUB’s two-way work sync is with Jira, so plan the move from Asana rather than a live sync.
SyncupHUB Cloud starts with a free one-month trial, then costs $7.65 per user per month; self-hosting has no recurring licence fee, with a one-time setup cost. Asana Starter was $10.99 per user per month billed annually, or $13.49 on monthly billing, when we checked on 27 September 2026, with portfolios, goals and approvals listed on Advanced. Entry plans are not feature-equivalent, so compare the tier your workflow needs.
Yes, shaped to delivery roles: seventeen persona agents backed by 59 sub-agents, each proposing work for a person to approve. Models run inside your tenant or through the OpenAI and Claude APIs your administrator approves, and in-tenant usage is unmetered.
See it in your own workflow
We’ll walk it through SyncupHUB on a 30-minute call: the requirements, integrations and commercial terms that would apply to your team.